I’m always leery (e.g. “Why is Dow advertising so much?”) when a company, about which you rarely think - in this case Johnson and Johnson (J and J) -, is advertising on TV. I usually suspect that it is being done to counteract some bad publicity somewhere. So I thought that perhaps the reason was that J and J had exclusive contracts with hospitals that it didn't want changed. So I “googled” it.
I discovered that in 2003 competitor Applied Medical Resources Corp. filed an antitrust suit against a J and J subsidiary for $54,000,000. In August 2006, J and J won the suit in California (see).
But I also discovered that, in November 2003 CONMED filed an antitrust suit against J and J and some of its subsidiaries (see). J and J lost this suit on March 31, 2007 and settled for $11,000,000 (see). Perhaps J and J is worried that some people are turning against it.
Now I understand the desire for exclusive contracts by companies. But the negative side is that hospitals get locked into prices and/or other products (that they might be able to buy less expensively elsewhere). And who pays those prices? As the song by the Ames Brothers in 1953 said, “You, You, You.”
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment